AI Readiness Benchmark
This is a ranking of named homepages, measured under the same rules on the same days, by how prepared they are for AI answers. It says who is eligible and ready — not who is cited; nobody can measure that without querying the engines at scale.
Every site that refused the fetch is listed with its reason, because a refusal is a finding.
Sites scored
67of 93 attempted
Median AI Readiness
47Poor
Median SEO Health
79Good
Sectors published
3of 3
Sectors
Global SaaS
AI Readiness
64median
SEO Health
80median
19 ranked of 21 attempted · leads: Zendesk at 75
See the table →E-commerce
AI Readiness
47median
SEO Health
71median
18 ranked of 36 attempted · leads: Gymshark at 71
See the table →News & media
AI Readiness
42median
SEO Health
80median
26 ranked of 36 attempted · leads: The Verge at 66
See the table →
How to read this
Ready, not cited
AI Readiness is whether a page is structurally prepared to be retrieved and quoted. It is not a count of citations, which no tool can take without querying the engines repeatedly.
A skipped site is a finding
A site that asked us not to is honoured; one that served a bot challenge or did not answer gets no score. All three are published with the reason, never dropped to flatter a median.
One engine, one wave
Every row was measured under engine 6.7. Scores are not comparable across engine versions, so a future wave is compared only against the same engine.
Where would you rank?
Run the same audit on your homepage. The report shows the same two scores, measured the same way, and where you stand against every site scanned on Maveriko. Free, no sign-up.
Sources
- Google Search Central — SEO starter guide
- Google Search Central — Intro to structured data
- schema.org — Getting started
Last reviewed .